CNA · story · 20 October – 22 October
Centrica · 3 headlines from 3 outlets, from 20 October 2026 to 22 October 2026.
Centrica shares rise and commentary asks if production guidance shifted the stock narrative.
The story's tone is the average of its headlines' own scores. Each score rates how good or bad the news was for the company, from −10 (clearly bad) to +10 (clearly good). 0 is neutral, and anything beyond ±6 is strong and rare. It rates the coverage, not the share price.
Average tone of each outlet's headlines in this story, −10 to +10. Impact = headlines × strength of tone.
MarketWatch is the largest at 5.2, 2.6 times Simply Wall Street (2.0). MarketScreener is the smallest at 1.7.
Source: MarketFrame news analysis
| outlet | Average tone |
|---|---|
| MarketWatch | 5.2 |
| Simply Wall Street | 2.0 |
| MarketScreener | 1.7 |
| Outlet | Headlines | Average tone |
|---|---|---|
| MarketWatch | 1 | +5.2 |
| Simply Wall Street | 1 | +2.0 |
| MarketScreener | 1 | +1.7 |
One or two headlines is not a lean: read these as how this story was told, not as a verdict on the outlet.
| Tone | What the article reported, and why it scored that way |
|---|---|
| +5.2 | Shares rose and outperformed the market. |
| +2.0 | Production guidance change prompts stock narrative discussion; direction unclear, mildly positive framing. |
| Tone | What the article reported, and why it scored that way |
|---|---|
| +1.7 | Routine 2026 production guidance, largely factual. |
A short, free morning email on how the news treated Centrica: the tone, the stories behind it, and when coverage starts to turn. Launching soon; one click to unsubscribe.